ȾɫÖÊÃâÒß³ÁµíÆÊÎöÊÖÒÕЧÀÍ
Ò»¡¢ÊÖÒÕ¼ò½é
ȾɫÖÊÃâÒß³Áµí·¨£¨Chromatin immunoprecitation£¬ChIP£©ÊÇÑо¿ÌåÄÚDNAÓëÂѰ×ÖÊÏ໥×÷ÓõÄÖ÷Òª¹¤¾ß¡£Ëü¿ÉÒÔѸËٵؼì²âÄ¿µÄÂѰ×ÓëÌØÒìDNAƬ¶ÏµÄÁ¬ÏµÇéÐΣ¬»¹¿ÉÒÔÓÃÀ´Ñо¿×éÂѰ×Óë»ùÒò±í´ïµÄ¹ØÏµ¡£ËüÄÜÕæÊµ¡¢ÍêÕûµØ·´Ó¦Á¬ÏµÔÚDNAÐòÁÐÉϵĵ÷¿ØÂѰף¬ÊÇÏÖÔÚÈ·¶¨ÓëÌØ¶¨ÂѰ×Á¬ÏµµÄ»ùÒò×éÇøÓò»òÈ·¶¨ÓëÌØ¶¨»ùÒò×éÇøÓòÁ¬ÏµµÄÂѰ×ÖʵÄ×îºÃÒªÁì¡£
»ùÀ´Ô´ÀíÊÇÔÚ»îϸ°û״̬ÏÂÀο¿ÂѰ×ÖÊ£DNA¸´ºÏÎ²¢½«ÆäËæ»úÇжÏΪһ¶¨³¤¶È¹æÄ£ÄÚµÄȾɫÖÊСƬ¶Ï£¬È»ºóͨ¹ýÃâÒßѧҪÁì³Áµí´Ë¸´ºÏÌå£¬ÌØÒìÐԵظ»¼¯Ä¿µÄÂѰ×Á¬ÏµµÄDNAƬ¶Ï£¬Í¨¹ý¶ÔÄ¿µÄƬ¶ÏµÄ´¿»¯Óë¼ì²â£¬´Ó¶ø»ñµÃÂѰ×ÖÊÓëDNAÏ໥×÷ÓõÄÐÅÏ¢¡£ËüÄÜÕæÊµ¡¢ÍêÕûµØ·´Ó¦Á¬ÏµÔÚDNAÐòÁÐÉϵĵ÷¿ØÂѰף¬ÊÇÏÖÔÚÈ·¶¨ÓëÌØ¶¨ÂѰ×Á¬ÏµµÄ»ùÒò×éÇøÓò»òÈ·¶¨ÓëÌØ¶¨»ùÒò×éÇøÓòÁ¬ÏµµÄÂѰ×ÖʵÄÒ»ÖֺܺõÄÒªÁì¡£
¶þ¡¢ÊµÑé°ì·¨
1¡¢ ¼×È©½»Áª
2¡¢ ³¬Éù´òËéDNA
3¡¢ ÃâÒß³Áµí
4¡¢ Ïû»¯ÂѰ×Öʼ°½â½»Áª
5¡¢ PCRÀ©ÔöÄ¿µÄÆô¶¯×ÓÆ¬¶Ï
Èý¡¢Ó¦ÓÃʵÀý
Fig1: ChIP analysis to detect in vivo binding of c-Jun to the dp5 promoter.
CGNs maintained in 25 or 5 K medium for 4 h were treated with formaldehyde to cross-link endogenous proteins and DNA. Samples of sonicated and purified chromatin were immunoprecipitated with a rabbit c-Jun antibody or a normal rabbit IgG. A, chromatins were sonicated into fragments about 0.5 kb in length. B, Western blotting analysis (WB) was performed using a monoclonal c-Jun antibody to demonstrate the immunoprecipitation (IP) specificity and efficiency and analyze c-Jun cellular protein levels. C, left, DNA isolated and purified from immunoprecipitated material was amplified by PCR with primers to amplify a 169-bp fragment of dp5 promoter spanning the ATF site (top), and a 173-bp fragment encompassing a canonical ATF sequence (TRE-jun2 site) located in the c-jun promoter was also amplified (bottom). The amplified PCR fragments were analyzed on 2% agarose gel.C, right, equal amounts of total genomic DNA (Input) were used for immunoprecipitation in each condition. Data are representative of three separate experiments.

·ÖÏíµ½£º